StartNot sure where to start? Pick your standard in 1 minute — free, no registration. Members: sign in with email on the right.

About LabKitPro

LabKitPro is an independent software workbench for the people who are answerable for a management system or for a laboratory’s accreditation. It covers five standards — ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO/IEC 17025 and IATF 16949 — and takes on the repetitive, document-heavy part of preparation: gap diagnosis, document drafting, compliance screening, and the calculations an auditor will ask to see. We are software. We are not a certification body, an accreditation body or a consultancy, and we issue neither certificates nor audit conclusions.

The five standards we cover

We deliberately do not flatten them into one generic “ISO”. They relate to the body that assesses you in three different ways, and that difference changes what your documents must say.

Four of the five are mid-transition, which is where most of the current confusion sits: the 2026 editions of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 are published (cutoffs 30 Sep 2029 and 30 Apr 2029); ISO 45001 is at DIS 40.60 with the new edition expected in 2027 and no transition period announced; IATF 16949 is in revision toward a 2nd edition. Only ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is current with no revision under way. Each standard page states the dates and what they rest on.

ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 share the same high-level structure (Annex SL), so one integrated set of documents can serve all three; national adoptions differ mainly in designation (GB/T 19001, BS EN ISO 9001, AS/NZS ISO 9001). ISO/IEC 17025 is an accreditation standard, not a certification one: country annexes such as CNAS-CL01-G001 add real requirements, so the same clause is assessed differently by CNAS and by UKAS. IATF 16949 is issued by IATF, not ISO, and builds on top of ISO 9001.

What the workbench actually does

Five capabilities on one shared context. The free tier is for trial runs, learning and demoing to a client; the deliverables you hand to a client or an auditor go through pay-per-use or a subscription.

Reality diagnosis
Score where you actually stand against real clauses and get a gap heat-map — free, no account. One engine serves all five standards, and the report states which standard and edition it applied.
Document drafting
Quality manual, procedures, work instructions and forms/records, generated from your context and editable in Word. On the 17025 side there is an 81-document library, 44 of them forms that stay free.
Compliance review
Paste or upload a manual, procedure or report and get findings with recommendations, each tied to the clause it rests on. It is a preparation screen, not an audit report.
Calculators
Uncertainty (GUM and Monte Carlo), MSA / Gage R&R, Cg/Cgk, SPC, Cpk/Ppk, FMEA, environmental aspect matrix, JHA — free and unlimited in the browser.
Compliance operations
Compliance calendar, CAPA tracker, document register and weekly digest — free, no sign-up, and the data stays in your own browser.

Who uses it

In-house owners
Quality managers, EHS and HSE leads, laboratory and technical managers — often the one person in a plant who owns the whole system and has to answer for it at the next surveillance audit.
Consultants and small practices
People running the same playbook across thirty to fifty clients. One workspace, per-client contexts, repeatable deliverables; a team edition with shared seats is available on request.

How we work

1
One shared context
Country, certification or accreditation body, sector, stage and scope are set once. Every tool reads the same context, so the gap report, the manual and the review never contradict each other.
2
No black box
Every output lists the clause numbers it rests on. No “the AI said so” — you can check each line against the copy of the standard you own.
3
Your files stay yours
Uploads are read inside your browser: not sent to our servers, not stored, not used for training, and gone when you close the tab.
4
Honest coverage
Where a country’s field-specific rules are not structured yet, the tool says so instead of implying depth we do not have. Edition and transition dates carry their basis, not a vague “around”.

What we deliberately do not do

·Certify or accredit. That decision belongs to your certification or accreditation body — never to software.

·Audit you. Compliance review produces findings and recommendations for your own preparation; it is not an audit report and cannot be presented as one.

·Reproduce standards. We cite standard numbers, clause references and publicly published body rules only; the text of ISO, IEC and IATF standards belongs to them and has to be licensed from them.

·Take over the work. No consulting engagements, no implementation projects, no calls — self-serve software, and email when something is wrong.

Contact

Product questions, bug reports or data requests: [email protected] · Contact page. We read every message.

Last reviewed October 2026. ISO, ISO/IEC and IATF standard names and numbers are cited for reference only and remain the property of their respective owners.